senthil1
11-15 07:16 AM
Aggressive increase of H1 will increase immigration and drive down the wages.That already happened after Dot com burst.Thousands of H1 people went back to India at that time and many people lost jobs.It was very tough to get the job beween 2000 to 2003.I think moderate increase of H1 is fine.But Skill bill gives market based increase every year and exemptions.This does not have American peple support.Actually Companies are trying to kill the hot job market in IT now.In reality Top 20 Indian companies does not have any problem in bringing people as they are using L1.Only American companies like Intel Microsoft may have a problem in getting people.Also Lot of Desi consulting companies rushing at the time of April and applying so many h1s to avoid caps.Anyone is not sure whether that is used or not.They are bringing people gradually and might not use some of h1s.Because of this lot of genuine companies cannot use h1s.They have to regulate h1s before increasing.I am sure even if they increase 200k H1 it will not be enough as so many people are waiting in India.Thats why they are asking market based increase every year and exemptions.Infact if they do this current h1 people will the imapct in another 2 years.There is no point if you have a gc but you will not be having a job.Since democrats win I won't be surprised that Skill may be pa*sed in current form.But election result does not favor or oppose immigration.Generally American public does not care about immigration as other issues are more important for them.
Moderate increase of GC( may be 300 to 400k) coupled with 120k h1s will give releif to everyone for next 5 to 10 years.As everyone knows companies are strongly lobbying for H1s but not Gcs though they are supporting.Companies will be happy if h1 is increased.
Moderate increase of GC( may be 300 to 400k) coupled with 120k h1s will give releif to everyone for next 5 to 10 years.As everyone knows companies are strongly lobbying for H1s but not Gcs though they are supporting.Companies will be happy if h1 is increased.
wallpaper holidays 2010 movie.Movie Lover#39;s Holiday Guide
nogc_noproblem
08-06 05:57 PM
:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D
HERE COMES THE BEST JOKE OF THIS THREAD
I got a RED dot for this post.
Comment - "Racist Joke".
Five Englishmen in an Audi Quattro arrived at an Irish border.
Checkpoint Paddy the officer stops them and tells them: "It is illegal to put 5 people in a Quattro, Quattro means four".
"Quattro is just the name of the automobile," the Englishmen retorts with disbelief "Look at the papers: This car is designed to carry five persons".
"You can not pull that one on me," replies Paddy "Quattro means four You have five people in your car and you are therefore breaking the law"
The Englishmen replies angrily, "You idiot!Call your supervisor over I want to speak to someone with more intelligence!".
"Sorry," responds Paddy, "Murphy is busy with 2 guys in a Fiat Uno"
HERE COMES THE BEST JOKE OF THIS THREAD
I got a RED dot for this post.
Comment - "Racist Joke".
Five Englishmen in an Audi Quattro arrived at an Irish border.
Checkpoint Paddy the officer stops them and tells them: "It is illegal to put 5 people in a Quattro, Quattro means four".
"Quattro is just the name of the automobile," the Englishmen retorts with disbelief "Look at the papers: This car is designed to carry five persons".
"You can not pull that one on me," replies Paddy "Quattro means four You have five people in your car and you are therefore breaking the law"
The Englishmen replies angrily, "You idiot!Call your supervisor over I want to speak to someone with more intelligence!".
"Sorry," responds Paddy, "Murphy is busy with 2 guys in a Fiat Uno"
xyzgc
12-17 04:33 PM
I'm going to give green to all the good folks on IV.
2011 holidays malayalam movie stills.Doubles Malayalam Movie Stills
prioritydate
09-27 06:55 PM
I wish Mc Cain to win this election.Republican party is good to India, pro-life, do not waste money and support same sex domestic partners.Their moral and cultural values are good.They do not increase taxes.Good for Industry.
I will support the party not the candidates.They are good for the security for the country.Terrorist are increased in all over the world.But no more attack on American soil.Clinton ignored the security of the country and we saw what happened.That time IT revolution happened.Not because of him the economic bubble occured.But it will happen, if any body is in power that time.
Do you what you are talking about?One more term for GOP is a disaster.McCain would do nothing but spending more money on Iraq.There is no policy for John McCain.His only aim to continue Iraq war for 4 more years, and if possible, another four more years.They DON'T support same sex marriages.Remember!they are conservatives for God's sake.Republican party is good for oil companies and big corporates.For normal people like us, and specially for an immigration community, it would be an irreversible damage.
I will support the party not the candidates.They are good for the security for the country.Terrorist are increased in all over the world.But no more attack on American soil.Clinton ignored the security of the country and we saw what happened.That time IT revolution happened.Not because of him the economic bubble occured.But it will happen, if any body is in power that time.
Do you what you are talking about?One more term for GOP is a disaster.McCain would do nothing but spending more money on Iraq.There is no policy for John McCain.His only aim to continue Iraq war for 4 more years, and if possible, another four more years.They DON'T support same sex marriages.Remember!they are conservatives for God's sake.Republican party is good for oil companies and big corporates.For normal people like us, and specially for an immigration community, it would be an irreversible damage.
more...
ArkBird
01-09 05:05 PM
so..by your logic, Al qaeda has declared war on the United states (they did, OBL issued that declaration some time in the late 90s) civilians die in each war, so alqaeda had every right to kill civilians in 9/11?
Of course not!Intentional targeting of civilians is inexcusable and constitutes a war crime and we should never cease to protest it regardless if it is done by a primitive terrorist or from the comfort of an F-16.
American Army was not hiding in World Trade Center and launching rockets on the civilians in Saudi from there.There was absolutely no target of military importance in WTC.Civilians got killed in Gaza because terrorist were hiding among them.
Quit hiding among women and children and fight like man on battlefield.
Of course not!Intentional targeting of civilians is inexcusable and constitutes a war crime and we should never cease to protest it regardless if it is done by a primitive terrorist or from the comfort of an F-16.
American Army was not hiding in World Trade Center and launching rockets on the civilians in Saudi from there.There was absolutely no target of military importance in WTC.Civilians got killed in Gaza because terrorist were hiding among them.
Quit hiding among women and children and fight like man on battlefield.
Ramba
08-05 03:25 PM
Please stop with this.this is truly offensive.Many of us happen to be truly qualified beyond your clarly limited imagination.Not all of us are in IT, not all of us work in body shops and NOT all of us deal with fraud in our lives.If a few do, then go chase the, and stop tarring us all with the same brush.This is really akin to my saying (and I'm not saying it) that all EB3 folks are just IT diploma holders working for body shops and the wh*le category is just a fruad.How does the tarring feel now?
I said most of the case.Not all.Ofcouse, most of the bodyshoppers does this abuse.Like labor subsitution, creating a duplicate job just to file EB2 etc..I am not blaming good US employers and employees.There are tons on non-IT genuine EB2 cases are there..
I said most of the case.Not all.Ofcouse, most of the bodyshoppers does this abuse.Like labor subsitution, creating a duplicate job just to file EB2 etc..I am not blaming good US employers and employees.There are tons on non-IT genuine EB2 cases are there..
more...
gc28262
08-05 03:04 PM
The solution for all this divisive arguments ?Sue USCIS for making all categories current in July 2007 when there weren't that many visa numbers available.
Many of the late PD holders wouldn't be in this discussion if we are successful with this lawsuit.:rolleyes:
Many of the late PD holders wouldn't be in this discussion if we are successful with this lawsuit.:rolleyes:
2010 (2011) Malayalam Movie
Suppose Sen.Barack Obama (Ill.) wins the Democratic nomination and picks Republican Sen.Chuck Hagel (Neb.) or Independent New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg as his running mate.Or, suppose Sen.John McCain (Ariz.) wins the GOP nomination and picks Independent Democratic Sen.Joe Lieberman (Conn.) as veep.
Suppose even further that, over this year's holidays, Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) and President Bush all resolve that next year they'll really try to live up to the pledges they all made in early 2007 to work across party lines to - as they all said - do the problem-solving work voters elected them for.
Is it all fantasy?Perhaps it is, given the hyperpartisanship of contemporary politics.Yet, every poll on the subject indicates that Americans are fed up with their politicians' incessant tribal warfare and inability to address problems everyone agrees are becoming more serious from inattention.
If the two parties' presidential nominees reached out across party lines to pick their running mates - Obama and McCain seem the likeliest to do so - it would serve as dazzling notice that times were changing.
It would be even more astounding if Congressional leaders and Bush could decide that, instead of repeating the dismal, few-achievements record of 2007, they'd resolve to solve at least one major problem in 2008 - say, pa*s tough but compa*sionate comprehensive immigration reform.
Over the holidays, America's political actors - and observers - would do themselves and the country a favor by reading Ron Brownstein's new book, "The Second Civil War," whose subtitle begins to tell it all: "How Extreme Partisanship Has Paralyzed Washington and Polarized America."
Brownstein, formerly with the Los Angeles Times and now political director of Atlantic Media Co.publications, vividly describes the historical origins of "hyperpartisanship," a term he borrows from a sometime practitioner of it, former Republican National Chairman Ken Mehlman.
More importantly - Brownstein eloquently laments the consequences of the disease and offers some fascinating remedies, some derived from former President Bill Clinton, whom he interviewed at length.Brownstein doesn't suggest picking vice presidents across party lines.Those are my radical imaginings - though they are derived from conversations with participants in presidential campaigns.
Brownstein has this right: America is the richest, most powerful nation on Earth, but its leaders can't agree on a plan to reduce dependence on foreign oil, can't balance the budget, can't provide health insurance to a sixth of its population, can't align its promises to retirees with its ability to pay the cost and can't agree on strategies to combat Islamic terrorism.
Why not?Because solutions to these problems require bipartisan "grand bargains" that polarized politicians are unwilling to make.
"Our politics today encourages confrontation over compromise," Brownstein writes."The political system now rewards ideology over pragmatism.It is designed to sharpen disagreements rather than construct consensus.It is built on exposing and inflaming the differences that separate Americans rather than the shared priorities and values that unite them."
Brownstein puts primary blame on conservative Republicans for the rise of "warrior" politics, especially former Speaker Newt Gingrich (Ga.) and House Majority Leader Tom DeLay (Texas), Bush and his former guru, Karl Rove, and their allies on talk radio.
But he observes that Democrats are catching up in hyperpartisanship, flogged on by MoveOn.org and leftist bloggers.Mainstream media, too, encourage conflict over consensus.And the public has become ideologically "sorted," as well, making the GOP more conservative, Democrats more liberal and moderates torn.
Brownstein gives rather more credit to Clinton than I would as a model centrist.He was that on policy - the "Great Triangulator" -but his personal misdeeds, slipperiness and tendency to respond savagely to threats made him as divisive as Bush, the "Great Polarizer."
But how can we end the war and engender vigorous, substantive debate that leads to consensus?Brownstein recommends that states banish closed primaries and allow registered independents to participate in picking candidates.
He also advises that political leaders look to a growing corps of cross-interest coalitions - such as the Business Roundtable, Service Employees International Union, AARP and National Federation of Independent Business - working to develop consensus solutions to problems such as health care and entitlement reform.
But the prime requirement is presidential leadership - a willingness to spend time with leaders of the opposition party, include them in policy deliberations, really heed their concerns and try to build electoral coalitions and Congressional support of 55 or 60 percent, not Bush's 50-plus-one.
"Imagine ...that such a president told the country that he would accept some ideas counter to his own preferences to encourage others to do the same.Surely such a president would face howls of complaint about ideological betrayal from the most ardent voices of his own coalition.
"But that president also might touch a deep chord with voters....It has always been true that a president can score points by shaking a fist at his enemies.But a president who extends a hand to his enemies could transform American politics." Amen.
Think about it over Christmas.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.